Tech articles

  • Why new websites disappear from Google search results?

    Why new websites disappear from Google search results?

    If you have built a new website recently, you might have noticed that your site is not showing up in Google search results even for the most obvious search queries. You might be frustrated in seeing no visitors coming directly from Google search. This is a typical phenomenon experienced by nearly all bloggers. Many lose patience and give up on their website because no one is reading their posts.

    Why is your new website not showing up on search results?

    It is due to a loosely known phenomenon called “Google Sandbox Effect”. Google simply does not like new sites, so they put these sites in a sandbox for some time and during this period, your site may show some of the symptoms listed below

    • Your website is not showing up for easy obvious search queries like your blogs name or a unique article. Or, your new site is outranked by other websites for these obvious search queries.
    • Your blog posts or web pages are not ranking for exact match title searches.
    • Your new blog posts show up on search results in the first page as soon as you submit it to Google, but it gets moved to page 10+ of search results in next few hours.
    • Google lists your pages on their search results, but the pages disappear after few hours/days.
    • You get zero or near zero traffic from Google.

    These are the few examples of the things your site may experience while it is in the sandbox.

    Why doesn’t Google show new sites in search results?

    It is simply to avoid spammy sites from ranking quickly in search results and taking advantage of the system. Currently, there are millions of SEO experts out there who can create a perfectly optimised site in no time. So, if Google allows new sites to easily show up on search results, these people would create spammy sites targeting highly competitive keywords and by the time Google find out these spammy sites and ban them, they would have made tens of thousands of dollars quickly. If Google bans them, they will simply create a new site do the process all over again.

    These sites are useless and give no value to Google’s users who are basically searching to find good web resources. So, by not allowing new sites to show up in search results, Google is simply trying to protect their own product from spams.

    Be sure that you are not doing something wrong

    1. Check your Robots.txt file. It is found at yourdomain/robots.txt section of your site. If it is misconfigured, you could be the one blocking Google from indexing your own site.
    2. Check if you are not plagiarising content. Google hates sites which copy paste content and often give them lower rank
    3. Check if your site has quality content.
    4. Check if you have not done any spamming activity or bought backlinks
    5. It is not sandbox if your site was getting traffic from google and it suddenly stopped. It is something else.

    How to get out of Google sandbox?

    The only thing you can do is wait. Typically new sites experience this sandbox effect for about six to ten months from the time they are created. Some bloggers have got out of Google sandbox in less time by getting high-value backlinks from established authority sites. But, some others have elongated their sandbox-time by trying to get low-quality backlinks from Fiverr or by spamming the comment section of other sites.

    What should new websites do in the meantime?

    Don’t be discouraged and continue building your website.

    • Keep writing new content and keep updating your site. You should have 100s of posts by the time Google releases you from this sandbox.
    • Try to do guest blogging on reputed sites.
    • Join Google webmaster tools and go to ‘Fetch’ section under ‘Crawl’. Now, fetch and render new links of your site, and click ‘index’ button when it shows up.
    • Use a good SEO plugin like Yoast SEO plugin if you are using WordPress.
    • Keep building good high-quality backlinks. Do not be tempted to buy 1000s of backlinks or spam forums.
    • Schedule posts on your site to get published once every week for next 10 months. Google loves a site with good activity.
    • Submit your posts to relevant subreddits on Reddit.
    • Build your social media audience

    The only thing you can do is to patiently wait for next six to twelve months. Be prepared for this long period with no traffic and you will reap your rewards next year. Don’t be like the millions of people who give up before they cross this sandbox period.

  • Free open source alternative to Skype – Ring

    Free open source alternative to Skype – Ring

    Skype may be one of the most important messaging tools on the market, but security has always been one of its weaknesses, and lack of access to the code for an audit does not help either. Those users who want a much more private profile in their communications are likely to come to the conclusion that the best option is to replace Skype altogether, and that’s when Ring appears. This client works in a decentralised way and has built compatible with the main operating systems.

    Why are you so insistent on the idea that current messengers are not suitable for users? One of the reasons that appear at the top of the list is “lack of transparency”. WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger use proprietary code (although the Signal Protocol in WhatsApp is GPLv3) . In fact, the owner is the same. We have no idea what happens in the background, what is shared, and who listens. WhatsApp’s scuffles with justice have been several, but that is no guarantee of anything. Computer security experts want to see the code, and they can not. The same thing happens with Skype, and worse, this client has appeared in filtered documents of the NSA.

    Ring is presented as a Skype clone, at least as far as its interface is concerned. The technical differences are quite broad, starting with a decentralised operation, based on the OpenDHT protocol. Each user receives a special 40-character RingID, which must be shared with others to initiate a contact. Encryption is applied end-to-end, and there is no data collection. Basically, the idea behind Ring is for communication to return to user control, regardless of its preferred platform. The official website delivers builds compatible with Linux, Windows, MacOS (OS X) and Android, in addition to the source code.

    Beyond his good intentions and the technological superiority that Ring can have in comparison with Skype and other similar messengers, the fundamental problem remains intact: The user is obliged to initiate an “evangelization” process for his contacts to adopt this Software and communicate with it. On the other hand, Ring is a work in progress, and anyone who wants to try it should expect all kinds of sharp edges (for example, the last beta 2 is not retro-compatible, and only connects with clients of identical version). These are classic challenges that many other projects have failed to overcome, however, we want Ring to be the exception.

    Ring Link: Ring website

  • Transform your face in a photo into a 3d image

    Transform your face in a photo into a 3d image

    Transforming 2D images into 3D models will always have limitations. After all, we are deforming textures and altering other aspects of the original image, but if you want to do your own experiments without installing additional software or spend hours assimilating tutorials, 3dthis.com portal has a very interesting tool called 3D Face. Load a photo with the face facing the camera, adjust the automatic detection, and explore the results.

    Many photos have impressive quality, but no matter how clever the person in charge of the shot, depth is one of the first things that are lost, especially when using basic equipment, such as the camera of a smartphone. Of course, along with the way, we find resources, tricks and optical illusions that seem to reproduce a certain “3D effect”, and one of the most important technologies that go in that direction is virtual reality. However, there is not much you can do with a traditional photo … unless you are involved in an advanced conversion process. In the case of Google Earth, the Mountain View giant uses thousands of images obtained with aeroplanes to develop 3D models.

    The portal 3dthis.com offers 3D Face, a tool to process self-portraits, and other images in which the face of a person looks directly at the camera (3D Face delivers very strange results when the face is in profile). Once the image is loaded, 3D Face will do a preliminary detection of coordinates, which we must adjust by hand. Once we are satisfied, we activate the conversion process and take us to a new section of the tool, which has several auxiliary animations, such as sadness, surprise, anger and happiness. The final step is to publish our results, but that requires creating an account on the page.

    In addition to being able to share and comment on the final animation, another option of 3D Face (perhaps the most important) is to convert the image into an MP4 video, which in turn enables the animated GIF. The performance of 3D Face is inferior when compared to more elaborate programs, but the ease of use and the conversions without limits play in your favour.

    Link -: 3DFACE

  • Are the high end smartphones worth it anymore?

    Are the high end smartphones worth it anymore?

    It is not surprising that new smartphones with better features are released every year. The craze for new smartphones is not a secret either. A lot of smartphone launching events, like the MWC, are held annually. And every time, most of the attention in these events is commanded by a handful of high-end phones, commonly known as flagship phones, by major companies. Although some of the hype is understandable, are these devices so awesome that it can be justified? Whether you’re a high-end smartphone owner or someone who hopes to own one someday, we hope this article will help you make some sense out of the ultra high-end mobile phone craze.

    First, let’s look at the specification of a typical flagship phone –

    • Snapdragon 820 or an equivalent processor,
    • 6GB or 8GB of RAM,
    • 5.2 to 6.2-inch screen,
    • Quad HD or 4K screen resolution,
    • 12 MP or better resolution camera
    • 4K video recording,
    • 32GB or 64 of internal storage,
    • and a 3000mAh battery.

    Let’s go through each of them one by one.

    Processor

    Snapdragon 820 is certainly an excellent processor, if not the best. It’s Exynos and Mediatek counterparts in the same league are Exynos 8890 and Helios X20 which are equally good. But the real question is- does an average customer require these powerful processors? Unfortunately, the answer is a resounding NO.

    A common man does not require such powerful processors, which come with a hefty price tag and also have some side-effects such as a fast-draining battery and overheating. These processors do not have any significant improvement in terms of utility for an average user, who uses some regular apps and a few games. We should start focusing on manufacturing highly battery efficient processors rather than just going all out on power.

    RAM

    Most high-end smartphones feature 4GB to 6GB of RAM nowadays. 6GB RAM for a phone! Seriously? The majority of the desktops/laptops do not have that. It is true that RAM is certainly useful for multitasking, but does a phone need this much RAM? If you are wondering if there are any disadvantages for having higher RAM, there is. It consumes a bit more battery, but far lesser than what the processor consumes. Other than that, there is nothing concerning with having a higher RAM except for the added cost.

    But even if you install 30 apps and run all of them in the background along with the system apps, the maximum RAM used by your phone would still be under 1.5 GB. So you don’t gain anything out of the higher RAM either, and end up losing a bit of battery too. So, do you want high RAM just to boast about this number?

    Display Size

    The screen size is always dependent on the preference of each user, so we are not going to comment about that, although we believe a 4.5 to 6-inch screen is ideal for an average user.

    Screen Resolution.

    Smartphones with 4k and QHD resolution displays are common these days..  4k is yet to become common in monitors and televisions, which is 10 times bigger than a mobile screen. To a naked human eye, the difference between 1080p, QHD and 4k display on a smartphone is not noticeable. Not to mention that high-end games suffer tremendous performance loss in QHD and 4k displays.

    To be frank, we believe that a QHD or 4k resolution on a smartphone is a major overkill. Our statement is supported by the GFX 3.1 Manhattan benchmark test. A device running at 1080p having Snapdragon 820 processor and Adreno 530 GPU would have a score in between 28 and 31, while a similar specced device with QHD would have a score between 14 and 17.

    The only area where high-resolution matters are Virtual Reality. So unless you are using Virtual Reality headsets, 1080p display is the optimal choice.

    Camera

    Within the last decade, camera in a phone has become the deciding factor for many. We can’t complain about the quality of the cameras in flagship phones these days. They do have a very good camera, which captures a lot of details. And same is the case with video recording. Now that megapixel war has come to an end, the new war has begun in terms of video resolution.

    All the flagship phones now support 4k video recording. But this does come at a cost- the cost of storage. Even the smallest of 4k videos clips consumes a considerable memory. Yes, you can change the video recording to 1080p. But, most of the phones supporting 4k video recording gives higher priority to 4k video recording and 1080p video recording is not optimised properly to give good results. But there are some phones which have good 1080p video recording along with 4k support.

    But the question is, do you want a 4k video recording capability, when it consumes so much storage that you won’t be able to use it and even if you manage to store it, the quality is almost on par with Full HD video that it doesn’t justify the extra space consumed?

    Internal Memory

    Internal storage is an area where development has been relatively slow. We’ve had media devices supporting 32 GB of internal storage more than a decade ago. And still, 64 GB is the limit of internal storage. The size of the apps, games, photos and videos have been increased largely, and yet the internal storage hasn’t. Technically it is quite easy to increase the internal storage, all the manufacturer has to do is to double the number of memory chips and your storage is doubled.

    A few of minutes of 4K recording could amount up to a couple of GBs in size and the size of a typical high graphics game is a couple of GBs as well. Some phones do have external memory card slot, but it is usually much slower than the internal memory. Although there are limitations for using an external memory card, it partially makes up for the lack of internal memory.   But we still feel that memory size hasn’t increased as much as it should have.

    Battery

    The battery is one of the most important aspects of a smartphone, and still, it is overlooked upon by many. It is overlooked by the manufacturers because they have full confidence that a person would buy a new phone even if the battery backup is low if the numbers of other specifications are high. But the same cannot be said about other specs.

    Powerbanks weren’t so common until recently. Is it because it was invented late? No, it is because it wasn’t required earlier. It is the failure on the part of manufacturers, as they produced ‘Smart’ phones which do not last for even few hours of use. So, Other companies took advantage of the situation introduced power banks as an accessory.

    Now, power banks have become an integral part of a smartphone user’s life. If other companies could identify this issue, why not the phone manufacturers? We don’t mind increasing the battery capacity at the cost of making the phones 1 or 2 mm more thicker. Razer thin phones with a couple of hours battery life is not what we want.

    Conclusion

    We are not saying that the current developments are bad. We just wanted to convey that the focus of new generation smartphones is not in terms of the things which gives maximum utility to the user. Some of the factors have improved very quickly, like the processor, RAM and video recording while some others like the battery and storage haven’t. Had they been equally developed, we would have been able to use the device to its full potential.

    Let’s hope that manufacturers to start making new phones on the basis of the utility each feature provides rather than racing to increase the ‘numbers’ in the specs. What use is 8GB Ram if 6GBs remain un utilized and is actually just draining the battery for no particular reason? Aren’t we paying for something which we do not actually need?

  • ArcaBoard: Will 2016 be the year of mainstream hoverboard?

    ArcaBoard: Will 2016 be the year of mainstream hoverboard?

    Many people have tried to make a hoverboard in the past using various weird methods. However, the ArcaBoard takes a more traditional path as that of brute force, using a total of 36 fans to raise a person several centimeters for a short time.

    The ArcaBoard have 36 fans producing 272 horsepower generating 196 kilograms of thrust using impressive amount of lithium-ion batteries. ArcaSpace, the creator of this hoverboard, began their journey as one of the original Ansari X Prize competitors in 2004. The ArcaBoard did not win any awards for its aesthetics, and seems incredibly difficult to control, assuming that the pilot has some kind of real control(yes, it has self-stabilizing, and can fly with a smartphone). How much high can it fly?About 30 centimeters.

    Arcaboard_Diagram

    And the basic question: What is the catch? Firstly, ArcaBoard can fly for only six minutes . No, it’s not a joke. The addition of more batteries cause the ArcaBoard to even beat its own weight. It takes 6 hours to recharge the battery, hover you can buy additional battery module which can be charged within 35minutes.  Finally, the hoverboard costs $ 19,900 , plus another $ 4,500 per battery module. We applaud in advance to all the pioneers who have decided to enter the pre-order and wait until April to receive it.

    exploded view arcaboard-3

    Official Site: Click here